User talk:JimWae
User:JimWae : Talk to me! | Check on my contributions!| Check my edit count!| Email Me! |
![]() |
This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Platinum Editor Star. |

- If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion.
- If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so you're most welcome to reply there rather than here.
- If appropriate, I will move talk from here to relevant article talk page, so that everyone can share in the discussion.
Archives
[edit]- User talk:JimWae/archive1
- User talk:JimWae/Canada
- User talk:JimWae/Lincoln, Civil War, etc.
- User talk:JimWae/Philosophy, Space, Time, Ethics
- User talk:JimWae/Articles dealing with religion
- User talk:JimWae/Formatting
- User talk:JimWae/Archives/2008
- User talk:JimWae/Archives/2007
- User talk:JimWae/Archives/2006
- User talk:JimWae/Archives/2005
Defender of Wikipedia
[edit]
--Hey, thank you very much, Husnock. I have now noticed vandalism on several articles that seems to be part of a class assignment gone astray --JimWae 19:39, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)
history articles on wikipedia?
[edit]Hello Jim, I'm an historian working at the Center for History and New Media at George Mason University (http://chnm.gmu.edu/) and we are very interested in digital historical works, including the writing of history on Wikipedia. We'd like to talk to people about their experiences working on articles in Wikipedia, in connection with a larger project on the history of the free and open source software movement. Would you be willing to talk with us about your involvement, either by phone, a/v chat, IM, or email? This could be as lengthy or brief a conversation as you wish.
Thanks for your consideration.
Joan Fragaszy
jfragasz_at_gmu.edu
Sounds interesting - I am going to be very busy the next month - and cannot plan exact times to chat - so let's start with e-mails --JimWae 18:34, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
Hi Jim, if you're more available now, I'm still very interested in speaking with you about your work on Wikipedia. Feel free to drop me an email at jfragasz_at_gmu_dot_edu. - Joan, 8/22/05
re: history articles on Wikipedia
[edit]Hi Jim, if you'd like to email me when you have some time I'm still very interested in speaking with you. Thanks, Joan Fragaszy. jfragasz at gmu dot edu
September 11, 2001 attacks
[edit]Examination of public videos reveals evidence of substantially different facts. Consider the contents of this video:* New Video Documentary of WTC Collapse As you watch, note particularly the differences in fact between this video and the wikipedia article, that are verifiable by you by reviewing the sources yourself (ie renting, buying or downloading). We are being lied to. Maybe we want to believe the lies because the truth implies intent from within. -unsigned by anon IP
Wikipedia 10
[edit]

The Interior cordially invites you to the Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup! It is being held at Benny's Bagels at 2505 W Broadway. Meetup will start at 6:30pm. Drop by for some Wikipedia-style conviviality and free gear! Feel free to forward this invitation to any Wikipedians who might be able to attend, and visit the discussion page to suggest activities. Hope to see you there and have a Happy 2011!
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
TUSC token 1f1747f8c6381b915c04cb28ced74777
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Existentialism
[edit]Thank you for your work on the existentialism article. After going through the definition issue for the "libertarianism" and "anarchism" pages, I understand how nerve-wracking establishing a definition for a term is when there's never been much general agreement on what the hell it actually means. Byelf2007 (talk) 18 April 2012
LED lamps
[edit]Before starting another editwar, we should discuss the point "Comparison to other lighting technologies". Did you own the G7 Power LED Light Bulb, 900 Lumen, Warm White, 9 Watt? This lamp is bad, it has an CRI of <75 in real. I have tested over 40 different LED-Lamps from all known brands (Pilips, Osram, Toshiba, Samsung, LG, Ledon, Megaman, Bioledex...) and know their quality. In my opinion the referenced lamps should be well known, proved models who are really representive for the possible quality of the LED technology. So why not use the winner of the US Department of Energy's L-Prize, holder of the EPA ENERGY STAR ? This lamp has moren REAL lumen, an good CRI and costs the same? In my opinion, we should change back the LED-Lamp to the Philips Ambient 12.5W.
Martin Heidegger
[edit]There is a discussion underway on the Martin Heidegger talk page that may be of interest to you.